Bring the context. REC prepares the conversation.
REC researches around what you want to explore and shows its work before camera.
01 / Choose what to explore and set the research scope.
02 / Review the dossier and questions.
03 / Record, review, and choose the moments.
Follow one interview
An operator wants to prove a better handoff.
A project review makes the claim. The interview tests it.
A claim and the receipts behind it.
A role note and project review show what changed—not whether it caused the result.
Check the baseline, mechanism, and limits.
Find the baseline, counterevidence, and exceptions.
“Show me the before, then test the explanation.”
Ask for the old workflow, the change, a receipt, another cause, and an exception.
The deeper method
Open the detail when you need it.
Workflow, evidence standards, and data boundaries—on demand.
Seven stagesSee the complete preparation-to-highlights workflow
- Set the real context. Add your role, context, and research scope.
- Choose the editorial outcome. Choose what the conversation should reveal.
- Build a grounded dossier. REC connects your perspective, supporting evidence, and gaps.
- Write the interview afresh. REC writes a fresh 12–15 question path.
- Verify before camera. Review the dossier, sources, and outline.
- Record the conversation. Record at your pace; use anchors only when helpful.
- Review moments worth publishing. Choose which recommended moments to render.
Research standardsSee how REC handles evidence and uncertainty
- Research follows the work. Named work and receipts matter more than biography or praise.
- Proof depends on the domain. REC looks for evidence that fits the work.
- Unknowns become questions. Gaps stay visible until the speaker resolves them.
- The guides are not templates. Every question is written for the session.
Privacy and controlSee what the workflow uses—and what it never does
REC searches public sources only when enabled. Approved context goes to its AI provider. Recordings stay private until you choose to download or share.