Walk through a shipped artifact
Use the product, prototype, specification, design file, or launch note as the spine of the conversation.
“The three revisions that made the workflow understandable.”
Loading REC…
Turn artifacts, product decisions, and hard tradeoffs into product stories people can actually learn from.
Product storytelling explains the problem, evidence, decisions, constraints, and consequences behind a product—not just its features. REC prepares an artifact-led solo interview so builders and product leaders can show how the work moved from need to shipped reality in their own words.
Free to apply · manually reviewed preview · pricing not yet published
Release notes record output. Demo videos show the happy path. Neither automatically reveals the judgment behind the product: the conflicting evidence, the option you rejected, the constraint that changed the design, or the failure that made the final version better.
“Build in public” can become a diary for other builders instead of a useful explanation for users, peers, or decision-makers. The stronger story begins with the audience’s problem and earns its way into the implementation detail.
Use the product, prototype, specification, design file, or launch note as the spine of the conversation.
“The three revisions that made the workflow understandable.”
Name the competing goals, the evidence available at the time, and the rule that decided between them.
“Why we chose a slower first run for a safer recovery path.”
Reconstruct the wrong assumption, signal, experiment, and behavior that changed afterward.
“The prototype result that reversed our roadmap.”
Preserve necessary terminology while connecting implementation detail to user and business consequences.
“What the architecture change means for the person waiting on the result.”
The artifact supplies the evidence. Your chosen outcome decides where the interview applies pressure.
Supply a product page, spec, prototype notes, launch recap, architecture decision, or other material you are allowed to use.
REC looks for artifacts, revisions, constraints, user behavior, tradeoffs, feedback, and observable outcomes—not startup mythology by default.
Review the dossier, sources, gaps, and question sequence before the browser asks for camera access.
Move through the prepared questions at your pace, then approve only the moments that keep enough context to be useful.
Fictional example: a product lead brings a public release note, a redacted decision memo, and a prototype comparison. REC prepares the questions; it does not claim the decision was correct.
Product demonstration only · not a customer or claimed result
Product storytelling explains the problem, evidence, decisions, constraints, and consequences behind a product. REC focuses the story on a real artifact and prepares questions that reveal why the product took its final form, rather than merely restating a feature list.
REC can help a builder explain public work, but it does not publish updates, track a public-building cadence, or replace a distribution channel. Its job is to prepare and record a substantive explanation grounded in the work.
REC supports supplied-material-only research, but the approved material is still processed by the configured AI provider. Only include material you are authorized and comfortable to use in that workflow.
No. REC records the person answering a prepared interview. You can discuss or show work you are allowed to share, but REC does not automatically generate a product walkthrough or screen-record the product.
Bring a specific project, claim, method, or body of work. Applying is free; preview applications are reviewed manually and pricing has not been published.